XIV
Ok. So I’ve read the positions of the proponents of Prop 8 both from a political and a religious standpoint. I understand that they are concerned about the “slippery slope” factor; what do we allow next? They are concerned about the deterioration of “traditional” family values and concerned that the voters are being denied their right and collective say in a society that relies on the votes of the individual to make and govern our laws. I understand that a large part of our population believe in a higher power and that most of these religions retain a firm position on homosexuality and it’s place, or lack thereof, in our society. They believe the word of God or Allah or whomever their diety may be is the absolute truth and constitutes the laws they should live by. But might I offer a civil discourse and an opposition that takes into consideration the thoughts and opinions of all Americans, even the ones I disagree with. In this blog I will not subscribe to any bigotry or ill mannered speak. I will not call names to the opposition or debase their reasons or beliefs. I will simply point out facts and opinions that ultimately shape one side of this debate, the side I believe to be correct. First I will start with the religious aspect as it is supposed to not have any legal power but is most definitely a root cause for the opposition of legally recognizing gay marriage. The most fundamental of flaws with this argument comes from the Christian side of this argument. I am going to use this as the cast for the religious right as they are the most prominent and vocal opposers. Jesus said “let he who is without sin cast the first stone”. In other words don’t judge others unless you yourself have nothing to be judged for. Second the separation of church and state is in the most basic of our beliefs as a nation. Yes the country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles but that is the key word, principles. Such things as respect and honesty are those basic principles that are not endemic to Christians but to all people across the globe. Our moral choices and standards ought not to be derived from religion but supported by it. Morality is not spurred from religion but from concious thought and the caring for our fellow man. third this is most definitely NOT a moral debate. This is not a political debate either but a legal issue. The moral debate can not and should not be argued on a national scale because it is obviously an asinine task but also because religion is a personal belief and a personal choice. It is a relationship that exists solely between yourself and your faith. It should not be put upon others who do not wish to subscribe to it nor should it be used as a shield to hide the faces and hate of the bigoted. Christianity, though I am not a person of faith, is a beautiful thing for those who believe. So much more than ethereal, it transcends the plane of an existance that we do not know nor understand but these people believe that through faith and good works they can attain a life far better than the one they lead here on Earth. And to tarnish that concept by using it as a tentpole for narrow minded and spiteful opinions is a shame. Second: the political and legal position. My favorite argument for this is Separate but Equal. the civil rights movement in the 1960’s was defined by this phrase which emanated 60 years earlier in the case plessy v ferguson. It is inherently false as things that are equal can not be separate. In the same vein as water fountains specified for white and black citizens we now have titles for life long legal commitments for straight couples, marriage, and for gay and lesbian couples, civil unions. We can not presume to say that citizens who happen to be gay are equal to straight Americans if we deny them the same constitutional rights. The voters have ruled though, how can this be overturned if the voters have decided? Well there happens to be an amendment in the constitution that states “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States…nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. The 14th amendment clearly states that the will of the people does not always translate to the law of the land. Gay Americans are protected equally under the rule of law and any deviation of said protection or diminished rights has been declared to be unconstitutional. This is segregation. This is the fear of upsetting the status quo. This is wrong. This does nothing but continue a cycle of segregation and fear. We must embrace all Americans and offer them equal rights under the constitution. This country is meant to be unfinished and we must always strive to make it better. This is the process and I must respect that but we need to remove our partisan blinders and realize that we are only hurting our country and in deed tarnishing it’s legacy if we continue to uphold laws like Prop 8.